'Washington is problem, not Baghdad, or Tehran'
By Bob Unruh
Editor's Note: This is another in WND's series of one-on-one interviews with candidates for the office of president. Today Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate, warns the biggest danger to the U.S. is located in Washington, D.C.
Charles Baldwin
The Constitution Party candidate for president says the biggest danger America faces is from Washington, D.C., not Tehran or Baghdad, and that he would jump at the opportunity to cut it down to size.
"I really believe that our nation is fast becoming a nation that does not respect the freedoms and liberties that this country was founded upon," Chuck Baldwin told WND in an exclusive one-on-one interview today. "George Bush's Patriot Act ... in essence eviscerated the Fourth Amendment and did serious damage to other amendments in the Bill of Rights. I do believe that this burgeoning North American Union that Dr. Corsi has written so much about ... is a real threat to our national sovereignty and our national independence."
Baldwin, picked the party's candidate recently at its national convention in Kansas City over the higher-profile Ambassador Alan Keyes, is the founder and pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola, Fla. He also hosts a weekly radio program called "Chuck Baldwin Live" and he serves as a columnist whose political commentaries are carried by a number of websites, newspapers and magazines.
Baldwin also has written two books, "Subjects Seldom Spoken On" and "This Is The Life," as well as a number of theological booklets. He also was the Constitution Party's vice presidential candidate in 2004.
"The biggest threat that faces America is not found in Tehran or Baghdad or any other country," he told WND. "I believe that our biggest threat is in Washington. D.C."
"I do believe that the determination to merge America into a regionalized government with Mexico and Canada is very real," he continued. "And ... I think it's progressing at a very fast pace.
"[But] the day that I take office that new world order comes crashing down. There's no North American community. We're getting out of NAFTA. There's no NAFTA superhighway. There's no NAU or any of that. We will retain the integrity of our national sovereignty and our national independence and to me that is a very high priority."
WND has reported on the progress in various areas on the idea of a North American Union, whose supporters say it is the concept of a continental region working together economically, for human rights and for security. Opponents see it no more or less than a not-so-subtle plan to turn the United States into just one part of a North American Union politically, economically and militarily.
"Ronald Reagan said a nation without boundaries is not a nation, and he's exactly right," Baldwin said, "and that's what's happening. The boundaries between our three countires are being blurred almost to the point they don't exist any more. And I believe it's deliberate, and I will put a stop to it.
"I'm opposed to it with every ounce of energy in my being. If God would smile on our endeavors and would somehow put us in the White House you can count on it that we will maintain the integrity of our national sovereignty and independence," he said.
Baldwin also said he thinks 2008 is different from other years, in that a third-party candidate has an oportunity for a greater impact.
"I think the electorate is totally open to alternative candidates and ideas this year. I think furthermore there is a deep distrust and suspicion among the American people that the two major parties have their best interests at heart," he said.
He also said U.S. troops need to be brought back from Iraq, as soon as that can be done safely.
"The longer we occupy Iraq, the more the enemy uses that occupation as a recruiting tool for those that would hurt us," he said. "I think our presence in Iraq is the biggest asset that al-Qaida and whatever other terrorists are over there have and they are using those troops to their advantage," he said.
On the home front, the No. 1 project would be to close the borders to the U.S.
"We can do it with a fence or we can do it without a fence. We have troops, National Guard troops, over in the Middle East that are protecting the borders of Iraq and other countries, by the way, yet we're not protecting our own borders," he said. "Whether we do it with a fence or not, we must close that border."
He also said his bully pulpit goals would be to see that Roe vs. Wade is overturned.
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act would take jurisdiction over abortion away from the courts and would recognize those who are unborn people, he said.
He also diverges from many other pro-family, pro-life interests on the federal Marriage Amendment.
"They don't see the danger of this. If a federal Marriage Amendment was enacted all that would do would [be to] authorize the Supreme Court to meddle with it, and by the time the Supreme Court would be done with it, it could be something far more monstrous than what the pro-life and pro-family people would want. I don't think that's a good idea," he told WND.
He said the nation's economy needs work, but nothing will be solved by printing money and throwing it around.
"It's an immediate feel-good approach, but it does nothing in the long run to solve the problem," he said. The costs of the war in Iraq need to be eliminated, and America needs to restore its energy production.
"I would dismantle the Department of Energy. I would get the government out of it," he said. "We need to get businesses pumping more oil again. We've got to open up the oil wells that we already know are there, and we've got to drill for new oil."
Read the full question-and-answer interview with Chuck Baldwin.
Original Source
By Bob Unruh
Editor's Note: This is another in WND's series of one-on-one interviews with candidates for the office of president. Today Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate, warns the biggest danger to the U.S. is located in Washington, D.C.
Charles Baldwin
The Constitution Party candidate for president says the biggest danger America faces is from Washington, D.C., not Tehran or Baghdad, and that he would jump at the opportunity to cut it down to size.
"I really believe that our nation is fast becoming a nation that does not respect the freedoms and liberties that this country was founded upon," Chuck Baldwin told WND in an exclusive one-on-one interview today. "George Bush's Patriot Act ... in essence eviscerated the Fourth Amendment and did serious damage to other amendments in the Bill of Rights. I do believe that this burgeoning North American Union that Dr. Corsi has written so much about ... is a real threat to our national sovereignty and our national independence."
Baldwin, picked the party's candidate recently at its national convention in Kansas City over the higher-profile Ambassador Alan Keyes, is the founder and pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola, Fla. He also hosts a weekly radio program called "Chuck Baldwin Live" and he serves as a columnist whose political commentaries are carried by a number of websites, newspapers and magazines.
Baldwin also has written two books, "Subjects Seldom Spoken On" and "This Is The Life," as well as a number of theological booklets. He also was the Constitution Party's vice presidential candidate in 2004.
"The biggest threat that faces America is not found in Tehran or Baghdad or any other country," he told WND. "I believe that our biggest threat is in Washington. D.C."
"I do believe that the determination to merge America into a regionalized government with Mexico and Canada is very real," he continued. "And ... I think it's progressing at a very fast pace.
"[But] the day that I take office that new world order comes crashing down. There's no North American community. We're getting out of NAFTA. There's no NAFTA superhighway. There's no NAU or any of that. We will retain the integrity of our national sovereignty and our national independence and to me that is a very high priority."
WND has reported on the progress in various areas on the idea of a North American Union, whose supporters say it is the concept of a continental region working together economically, for human rights and for security. Opponents see it no more or less than a not-so-subtle plan to turn the United States into just one part of a North American Union politically, economically and militarily.
"Ronald Reagan said a nation without boundaries is not a nation, and he's exactly right," Baldwin said, "and that's what's happening. The boundaries between our three countires are being blurred almost to the point they don't exist any more. And I believe it's deliberate, and I will put a stop to it.
"I'm opposed to it with every ounce of energy in my being. If God would smile on our endeavors and would somehow put us in the White House you can count on it that we will maintain the integrity of our national sovereignty and independence," he said.
Baldwin also said he thinks 2008 is different from other years, in that a third-party candidate has an oportunity for a greater impact.
"I think the electorate is totally open to alternative candidates and ideas this year. I think furthermore there is a deep distrust and suspicion among the American people that the two major parties have their best interests at heart," he said.
He also said U.S. troops need to be brought back from Iraq, as soon as that can be done safely.
"The longer we occupy Iraq, the more the enemy uses that occupation as a recruiting tool for those that would hurt us," he said. "I think our presence in Iraq is the biggest asset that al-Qaida and whatever other terrorists are over there have and they are using those troops to their advantage," he said.
On the home front, the No. 1 project would be to close the borders to the U.S.
"We can do it with a fence or we can do it without a fence. We have troops, National Guard troops, over in the Middle East that are protecting the borders of Iraq and other countries, by the way, yet we're not protecting our own borders," he said. "Whether we do it with a fence or not, we must close that border."
He also said his bully pulpit goals would be to see that Roe vs. Wade is overturned.
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act would take jurisdiction over abortion away from the courts and would recognize those who are unborn people, he said.
He also diverges from many other pro-family, pro-life interests on the federal Marriage Amendment.
"They don't see the danger of this. If a federal Marriage Amendment was enacted all that would do would [be to] authorize the Supreme Court to meddle with it, and by the time the Supreme Court would be done with it, it could be something far more monstrous than what the pro-life and pro-family people would want. I don't think that's a good idea," he told WND.
He said the nation's economy needs work, but nothing will be solved by printing money and throwing it around.
"It's an immediate feel-good approach, but it does nothing in the long run to solve the problem," he said. The costs of the war in Iraq need to be eliminated, and America needs to restore its energy production.
"I would dismantle the Department of Energy. I would get the government out of it," he said. "We need to get businesses pumping more oil again. We've got to open up the oil wells that we already know are there, and we've got to drill for new oil."
Read the full question-and-answer interview with Chuck Baldwin.
Original Source
Posted: April 29, 2008
10:15 pm Eastern
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
Editor's Note: This is one in a series of question-and-answer sessions with candidates for the office of president. Today, Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin says this could be the year for a third-party candidate.
Editor's Note: This is one in a series of question-and-answer sessions with candidates for the office of president. Today, Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin says this could be the year for a third-party candidate.
Charles Baldwin
WND: What is your assessment of the 2008 presidential race? Typically, third-party candidates have struggled even to get attention.
Baldwin: I think this year is different from anything that we've ever experienced in my lifetime. I think the American people are extremely fed up with the two major parties. I don't believe that any of the main three candidates, John McCain, Hillary or Obama, have captured the loyalty of the American people. I think the electorate is totally open to alternative candidates and ideas this year. I think furthermore there is a deep distrust and suspicion among the American people that the two major parties have their best interests at heart. Therefore I think the opportunity is wide open for an independent or a third-party candidate to do well. As to what the outcome will be, that's in the hands of God. But I do believe this is an historic opportunity for third-party or independent party candidates.
WND: Don't people forget the Republican Party started out as a third-party?
Baldwin: When Abraham Lincoln ran his party was just a young party, a third party or an independent party. Of course then it became a dominant party when he won the election in 1860. Remember, too, that in that race there were four major candidates running for the office of president, and he won with 39 percent of the popular vote, so you don't have to have a majority of the popular vote to win, and I do believe that we are hopefully seeing the beginning of the end of the two-party monopoly on our political process. Our country was not founded on political parties. Our country was founded on principles, bedrock principles, and as the party serves the country, they can be beneficial, but when the party ceases to serve the country they should be discarded. If you read Washington's farewell address, you will see he very emphatically warned the American people about an over-infatuation with political parties. He talked about how sometimes the propensity is for people to put the party interests above the country's interests, and I think that's what the Republicans and the Democrats have been doing for many years, but I think it's more apparent to the American people this year.
WND: What should and could the United States be doing in the war on terror?
Baldwin: The first thing that I would if I were elected president would be to begin the process of bringing our troops home from Iraq. I do not believe that the war in Iraq is serving to make our country safer. I think just the opposite. The longer we occupy Iraq, the more the enemy uses that occupation as a recruiting tool for those that would hurt us. I think our presence in Iraq is the biggest asset that al-Qaida and whatever other terrorists are over there have and they are using those troops to their advantage. I do believe we must secure our borders and our ports. It is absolutely asinine to think we would send troops to the Middle East to fight terrorism while at the same time, leave our own country's borders wide open to potential terrorists sneaking across those borders that may do us harm. The first thing we need to do is seal our borders and our ports, to ensure that we will no longer make our country vulnerable to potentialsterrorists and then I would bring the troops home as expeditiously as possible. Obviously there would have to be a plan in place to do that so that we could do that safely, but to bring those troops home and be sure that we no longer provide the catalyst that I think we have in the past in being perceived as an aggressor in other nations' affairs.
(Story continues below)
WND: What about the nation's response to illegal immigration?
Baldwin: We have to close the border, and we can close the border. We can do it with a fence or we can do it without a fence. We have troops, National Guard troops, over in the Middle East that are protecting the borders of Iraq and other countries by the way, yet we're not protecting our own borders. Whether we do it with a fence or not, we must close that border. We must seal it shut. Secondly, we must punish those employers who are hiring illegal aliens. You cut off the food source, the food supply, and make it clear to employers that if they hire illegal aliens they are going to jail. It's not just pay a fine, it's going to jail. They are no longer going to be able to use slave labor in order to increase the profits for their companies. They're going to have to abide by the law. They're going to have hire people who are in the country legally, and do it the way it's supposed to be done. We're going to make sure we seal that border so that not just terrorists but MS-13 and the other gangs that are beginning to blossom in that part of the region no longer have a fertile field to grow.
WND: What's your perspective on the issue of Roe vs. Wade?
Baldwin: There's several ways you can go about this . First I would use the bully pulpit of the White House to pressure Congress to pass Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act, which he has introduced into the Congress every year. This act would do two things. No. 1 it would take out from the courts jurisdiction over abortion, which means Roe vs. Wade is overturned. Secondly, it would identify unborn persons as persons under the law. Right now that distinction is not known, and unborn children are not classified as people and that's how Roe vs. Wade can stand. Ron Paul's deal would negate both of those. It would eliminate the jurisdiction of the courts ... and then No. 2, it would declare the personhood of the unborn child. The other thing is that if Congress refuses to act, I would use the power of the executive branch to [stop] funds to enforce Roe vs. Wade.
WND: What's your perspective of the federal Marriage Amendment?
Baldwin: I know that a lot of my pro-family friends that don't agree with me on this. They don't see the danger of this. If a federal Marriage Amendment was enacted all that would do would [be to] authorize the Supreme Court to meddle with it, and by the time the Supreme Court would be done with it, it could be something far more monstrous than what the pro-life and pro-family people would want. I don't that's a good idea. I don't think that's a necessary approach. First of all I support the Defense of Marriage Act that was already was passed by Congress and signed by then-President Clinton. So it's already the federal law that they recognize marriage is between a man and a woman. That's already been done and I support that. I also believe that the states have the right and I would defend the rights of the state to protect that definition of a man and woman for legal marriage. In other words, they would not be forced to accept another state's definition, say Massachusetts or another liberal state that would try to redefine marriage.
WND: What should the U.S. be doing to protect its own economy?
Baldwin: First of all you're not going to solve the economic problems by printing more worthless money and throwing it into the money supply. All that does is tend to devalue the dollar even further which increases inflation, increases the price of everything. That does no good. It's an immediate feel-good approach, but it does nothing in the long run to solve the problem. First of all the war in Iraq. We're talking about a war that's taking trillions, not billions, trillions of dollars out of our economy. When that is over and we bring our troops home and we're no longer expending those funds, for those purposes, obviously that's a huge savings, from an economic point of view. Secondly, I really believe we've got to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. I think so much of the economic crisis we're in today is related directly to the cost of gas and the oil pressures that are now being felt. The dollar's dropping. oil's rising, inflation's rising, unemployment's rising, and I believe we've got to get a handle on that. The way we've got to do that is get the government out of the energy business. I would dismantle the Department of Energy. I would get the government out of it. We need to get businesses pumping more oil again. We've got to open up the oil wells that we already know are there, and we've got to drill for new oil. We know that in Alaska, for example, there is enough oil under the soil of Alaska to take care of our energy needs for the next 150-200 years. There's more oil in Alaska than there is in Saudi Arabia. We've just discovered huge oil and gas deposits in the Dakotas, we've discovered huge oil and gas deposits in the Gulf of Mexico. Nuclear energy. We haven't built a nuclear plant in what? 35 years or more? We've got to get our country producing again. We need to cut our dependence on OPEC, Venezuela and these other foreign interests. And I do think, I know we can do it, it's just a matter of having the will to do it. And so far neither political party has the will to do this. I would have the will do it.
WND: What other issues will your campaign focus on?"
Baldwin: The biggest threat that faces America is not found in Tehran or Baghdad or any other country. I believe that our biggest threat is in Washington, D.C. I really believe that our nation is fast becoming a nation that does not respect the freedoms and liberties that this country was founded upon. George Bush's Patriot Act ... in essence eviscerated the Fourth Amendment and did serious damage to other amendments in the Bill of Rights. I do believe that this burgeoning North American Union that Dr. Corsi has written so much about in your newspaper is a real threat to our national sovereignty and our national independence . I do believe that the determination to merge America into a regionalized government with Mexico and Canada is very real. And I think that it is very real and I think it's progressing at a very fast pace. The day that I take office that new world order comes crashing down. There's no North American community. We're getting out of NAFTA. There's no NAFTA superhighway. There's no NAU or any of that. We will retain the integrity of our national sovereignty and our national independence, and to me that is a very high priority.
Ronald Reagan said a nation without boundaries is not a nation, and he's exactly right, and that's what's happening. The boundaries between our three countries are being blurred almost to the point they don't exist any more. and I believe it's deliberate, and I will put a stop to it. I'm opposed to it with every ounce of energy in my being. If God would smile on our endeavors and would somehow put us in the White House you can count on it that we will maintain the integrity of our national sovereignty and independence.
Original Source
WND: What is your assessment of the 2008 presidential race? Typically, third-party candidates have struggled even to get attention.
Baldwin: I think this year is different from anything that we've ever experienced in my lifetime. I think the American people are extremely fed up with the two major parties. I don't believe that any of the main three candidates, John McCain, Hillary or Obama, have captured the loyalty of the American people. I think the electorate is totally open to alternative candidates and ideas this year. I think furthermore there is a deep distrust and suspicion among the American people that the two major parties have their best interests at heart. Therefore I think the opportunity is wide open for an independent or a third-party candidate to do well. As to what the outcome will be, that's in the hands of God. But I do believe this is an historic opportunity for third-party or independent party candidates.
WND: Don't people forget the Republican Party started out as a third-party?
Baldwin: When Abraham Lincoln ran his party was just a young party, a third party or an independent party. Of course then it became a dominant party when he won the election in 1860. Remember, too, that in that race there were four major candidates running for the office of president, and he won with 39 percent of the popular vote, so you don't have to have a majority of the popular vote to win, and I do believe that we are hopefully seeing the beginning of the end of the two-party monopoly on our political process. Our country was not founded on political parties. Our country was founded on principles, bedrock principles, and as the party serves the country, they can be beneficial, but when the party ceases to serve the country they should be discarded. If you read Washington's farewell address, you will see he very emphatically warned the American people about an over-infatuation with political parties. He talked about how sometimes the propensity is for people to put the party interests above the country's interests, and I think that's what the Republicans and the Democrats have been doing for many years, but I think it's more apparent to the American people this year.
WND: What should and could the United States be doing in the war on terror?
Baldwin: The first thing that I would if I were elected president would be to begin the process of bringing our troops home from Iraq. I do not believe that the war in Iraq is serving to make our country safer. I think just the opposite. The longer we occupy Iraq, the more the enemy uses that occupation as a recruiting tool for those that would hurt us. I think our presence in Iraq is the biggest asset that al-Qaida and whatever other terrorists are over there have and they are using those troops to their advantage. I do believe we must secure our borders and our ports. It is absolutely asinine to think we would send troops to the Middle East to fight terrorism while at the same time, leave our own country's borders wide open to potential terrorists sneaking across those borders that may do us harm. The first thing we need to do is seal our borders and our ports, to ensure that we will no longer make our country vulnerable to potentialsterrorists and then I would bring the troops home as expeditiously as possible. Obviously there would have to be a plan in place to do that so that we could do that safely, but to bring those troops home and be sure that we no longer provide the catalyst that I think we have in the past in being perceived as an aggressor in other nations' affairs.
(Story continues below)
WND: What about the nation's response to illegal immigration?
Baldwin: We have to close the border, and we can close the border. We can do it with a fence or we can do it without a fence. We have troops, National Guard troops, over in the Middle East that are protecting the borders of Iraq and other countries by the way, yet we're not protecting our own borders. Whether we do it with a fence or not, we must close that border. We must seal it shut. Secondly, we must punish those employers who are hiring illegal aliens. You cut off the food source, the food supply, and make it clear to employers that if they hire illegal aliens they are going to jail. It's not just pay a fine, it's going to jail. They are no longer going to be able to use slave labor in order to increase the profits for their companies. They're going to have to abide by the law. They're going to have hire people who are in the country legally, and do it the way it's supposed to be done. We're going to make sure we seal that border so that not just terrorists but MS-13 and the other gangs that are beginning to blossom in that part of the region no longer have a fertile field to grow.
WND: What's your perspective on the issue of Roe vs. Wade?
Baldwin: There's several ways you can go about this . First I would use the bully pulpit of the White House to pressure Congress to pass Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act, which he has introduced into the Congress every year. This act would do two things. No. 1 it would take out from the courts jurisdiction over abortion, which means Roe vs. Wade is overturned. Secondly, it would identify unborn persons as persons under the law. Right now that distinction is not known, and unborn children are not classified as people and that's how Roe vs. Wade can stand. Ron Paul's deal would negate both of those. It would eliminate the jurisdiction of the courts ... and then No. 2, it would declare the personhood of the unborn child. The other thing is that if Congress refuses to act, I would use the power of the executive branch to [stop] funds to enforce Roe vs. Wade.
WND: What's your perspective of the federal Marriage Amendment?
Baldwin: I know that a lot of my pro-family friends that don't agree with me on this. They don't see the danger of this. If a federal Marriage Amendment was enacted all that would do would [be to] authorize the Supreme Court to meddle with it, and by the time the Supreme Court would be done with it, it could be something far more monstrous than what the pro-life and pro-family people would want. I don't that's a good idea. I don't think that's a necessary approach. First of all I support the Defense of Marriage Act that was already was passed by Congress and signed by then-President Clinton. So it's already the federal law that they recognize marriage is between a man and a woman. That's already been done and I support that. I also believe that the states have the right and I would defend the rights of the state to protect that definition of a man and woman for legal marriage. In other words, they would not be forced to accept another state's definition, say Massachusetts or another liberal state that would try to redefine marriage.
WND: What should the U.S. be doing to protect its own economy?
Baldwin: First of all you're not going to solve the economic problems by printing more worthless money and throwing it into the money supply. All that does is tend to devalue the dollar even further which increases inflation, increases the price of everything. That does no good. It's an immediate feel-good approach, but it does nothing in the long run to solve the problem. First of all the war in Iraq. We're talking about a war that's taking trillions, not billions, trillions of dollars out of our economy. When that is over and we bring our troops home and we're no longer expending those funds, for those purposes, obviously that's a huge savings, from an economic point of view. Secondly, I really believe we've got to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. I think so much of the economic crisis we're in today is related directly to the cost of gas and the oil pressures that are now being felt. The dollar's dropping. oil's rising, inflation's rising, unemployment's rising, and I believe we've got to get a handle on that. The way we've got to do that is get the government out of the energy business. I would dismantle the Department of Energy. I would get the government out of it. We need to get businesses pumping more oil again. We've got to open up the oil wells that we already know are there, and we've got to drill for new oil. We know that in Alaska, for example, there is enough oil under the soil of Alaska to take care of our energy needs for the next 150-200 years. There's more oil in Alaska than there is in Saudi Arabia. We've just discovered huge oil and gas deposits in the Dakotas, we've discovered huge oil and gas deposits in the Gulf of Mexico. Nuclear energy. We haven't built a nuclear plant in what? 35 years or more? We've got to get our country producing again. We need to cut our dependence on OPEC, Venezuela and these other foreign interests. And I do think, I know we can do it, it's just a matter of having the will to do it. And so far neither political party has the will to do this. I would have the will do it.
WND: What other issues will your campaign focus on?"
Baldwin: The biggest threat that faces America is not found in Tehran or Baghdad or any other country. I believe that our biggest threat is in Washington, D.C. I really believe that our nation is fast becoming a nation that does not respect the freedoms and liberties that this country was founded upon. George Bush's Patriot Act ... in essence eviscerated the Fourth Amendment and did serious damage to other amendments in the Bill of Rights. I do believe that this burgeoning North American Union that Dr. Corsi has written so much about in your newspaper is a real threat to our national sovereignty and our national independence . I do believe that the determination to merge America into a regionalized government with Mexico and Canada is very real. And I think that it is very real and I think it's progressing at a very fast pace. The day that I take office that new world order comes crashing down. There's no North American community. We're getting out of NAFTA. There's no NAFTA superhighway. There's no NAU or any of that. We will retain the integrity of our national sovereignty and our national independence, and to me that is a very high priority.
Ronald Reagan said a nation without boundaries is not a nation, and he's exactly right, and that's what's happening. The boundaries between our three countries are being blurred almost to the point they don't exist any more. and I believe it's deliberate, and I will put a stop to it. I'm opposed to it with every ounce of energy in my being. If God would smile on our endeavors and would somehow put us in the White House you can count on it that we will maintain the integrity of our national sovereignty and independence.
Original Source
![[Valid RSS]](http://www.battalionofdeborah.org/logos/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")