When the Great War comes, said old Bismarck, it will come out of "some
damn fool thing in the Balkans."
On June 28, 1914, Gavrilo Princip shot the archduke and heir to the
Austrian throne, Franz Ferdinand, in Sarajevo, setting in motion the
train of events that led to the first world war.
In the spring 1999, the United States bombed Serbia for 78 days to
force its army out of that nation's cradle province of Kosovo. The
Serbs were fighting Albanian separatists of the Kosovo Liberation Army,
or KLA. And we had no more right to bomb Belgrade than the Royal Navy
would have had to bombard New York in our Civil War.
We bombed Serbia, we were told, to stop the genocide in Kosovo. But
there was no genocide. This was propaganda. The United Nations' final
casualty count of Serbs and Albanians in Slobodan Milosevic's war did
not add up to 1 percent of the dead in Mr. Lincoln's war.
Albanians did flee in the tens of thousands during the war. But since
that war's end, the Serbs of Kosovo have seen their churches and
monasteries smashed and vandalized and have been ethnically cleansed in
the scores of thousands from their ancestral province. In the exodus,
they have lost everything. The remaining Serb population of 120,000 is
largely confined to enclaves guarded by NATO troops.
"At a Serb monastery in Pec," writes the Washington Post, "Italian
troops protect the holy site, which is surrounded by a massive new wall
to shield elderly nuns from stone-throwing and other abuse by passing
ethnic Albanians."
On Sunday, Kosovo declared independence and was recognized by the
European Union and President Bush. But this is not the end of the
story. It is only the preface to a new history of the Balkans, a region
that has known too much history.
By intervening in a civil war to aid the secession of an ancient
province, to create a new nation that has never before existed and, to
erect it along ethnic, religious and tribal lines, we have established
a dangerous precedent. Muslim and Albanian extremists are already
talking of a Greater Albania, consisting of Albania, Kosovo and the
Albanian-Muslim sectors of Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia.
If these Albanian minorities should demand the right to secede and join
their kinsmen in Kosovo, on what grounds would we oppose them? The
inviolability of borders? What if the Serb majority in the Mitrovica
region of northern Kosovo, who reject Albanian rule, secede and call on
their kinsmen in Serbia to protect them?
Would we go to war against Serbia, once again, to maintain the
territorial integrity of Kosovo, after we played the lead role in
destroying the territorial integrity of Serbia?
Inside the U.S.-sponsored Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the
autonomous Serb Republic of Srpska is already talking secession and
unification with Serbia. On what grounds would we deny them?
The U.S. war on Serbia was unconstitutional, unjust and unwise.
Congress never authorized it. Serbia, an ally in two world wars, had
never attacked us. We made an enemy of the Serbs, and alienated Russia,
to create a second Muslim state in the Balkans.
By intervening in a civil war where no vital interest was at risk, the
United States, which is being denounced as loudly in Belgrade today as
we are being cheered in Pristina, has acquired another dependency. And
our new allies, the KLA, have been credibly charged with human
trafficking, drug dealing, atrocities and terrorism.
And the clamor for ethnic self-rule has only begun to be heard.
Rumania has refused to recognize the new Republic of Kosovo, for the
best of reasons. Bucharest rules a large Hungarian minority in
Transylvania, acquired at the same Paris Peace Conference of 1919 where
Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia-Herzegovina were detached from Vienna and
united with Serbia.
Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two provinces that have broken away from
Georgia, are invoking the Kosovo precedent to demand recognition as
independent nations. As our NATO expansionists are anxious to bring
Georgia into NATO, here is yet another occasion for a potential
Washington-Moscow clash.
Spain, too, opposed the severing of Kosovo from Serbia, as Madrid faces
similar demands from Basque and Catalan separatists.
The Muslim world will enthusiastically endorse the creation of a new
Muslim state in Europe at the expense of Orthodox Christian Serbs. But
Turkey is also likely to re-raise the issue as to why the EU and United
States do not formally recognize the Turkish Republic of Northern
Cyprus. Like Kosovo, it, too, is an ethnically homogeneous community
that declared independence 25 years ago.
Breakaway Transneistria is seeking independence from Moldova, the
nation wedged between Rumania and Ukraine, and President Putin of
Russia has threatened to recognize it, Abkhazia and South Ossetia in
retaliation for the West's recognition of Kosovo.
If Putin pauses, it will be because he recognizes that of all the
nations of Europe, Russia is high among those most threatened by the
serial Balkanization we may have just reignited in the Balkans.
Original
Source
|
|
|||||||||
|
Shabbat Times
Subscribe 4 Updates
About Us
Search
Donations
This Month
Month Archive
Recent Photos
Login
|
Does Balkanization beckon anew?
Comments
No comments found.
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||


![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://www.battalionofdeborah.org/logos/valid-rss.png)