And the Canaanites were then in the land. Then the LORD appeared to
Abram and said, “To your descendants I will give this land.” And there
he built an altar to the LORD, who had appeared to him. (Genesis 12:6-7)
One of the arguments against the Jews’ right to sovereignty over their
historical homeland, or conversely for the Palestinian Arabs’ right to
a national homeland in these biblically Jewish lands, is that even
though the Jews had a virtually unbroken presence here through the last
2000 years, in the centuries before 1948 it was the Arabs who comprised
the overwhelming majority of the overall inhabitants, with the number
of Jews almost marginal at one time.
Today this argument is applied to the “West Bank,” with some
demographers pointing out that there are 2.5 million Arabs (90%) as
compared to just 255,600 Jews (9.4%) in Samaria and Judea.
And since the “Disengagement” in 2005, the Gaza Strip is said to have
1.4 million Arabs, and not a single Jew.
No serious authority disputes that there were many more Arabs than Jews
in Ottoman Empire Palestine at the end of the 18th century. According
to respected historians like American Howard M. Sachar, there were only
6,000 Jews in Palestine in 1800 out of what, by 1840, was a total of
400,000 inhabitants.
While tens of thousands of Jews did begin flooding into the land from
1882 onwards, the Arab majority remained strong, so that in 1914 there
were 60,000 Jews and 730,000 Arabs resident here.
Of course, 76 percent of Palestine (with its people) was lopped off and
turned into Trans-Jordan in 1922, its Palestinian Arabs eventually
becoming Jordanian citizens. Even so, the ratio in what was left of
Palestine by 1948 stood, according to pro-Arab sources, at 2:1, with
Jews numbering about 600,000 to the Arabs’ 1.2 million. Other sources
put the Arab population figures lower, at just under one million.
Whatever the case, there were a good deal more Arabs than Jews all the
way along.
This, triumphantly crow Israel’s enemies, more than supports the Arab
claim to all of the land, and means that it is the Arabs who are being
asked to concede land, because the land is theirs.
And indeed this is the Arab position. Israel’s friends may assert that
it is the Jews who are being asked to make the tangible territorial
sacrifices in the land-for-peace process, the Arabs and their
supporters insist the opposite is true.
Western nations, from the earliest years of the 20th Century, fully
aware that the Arabs massively outnumbered the Jews and always will
and, with the industrial revolution in full flight, discovering that
the lands on which the Arab states were being established were
saturated with oil, happily adopted this convenient Arab position and
have gone along with it ever since.
Historically, the numbers may favor the Arabs, but from the point of
view of national ownership, it is the Jews - with their forefathers’
history of founding the nation of Israel here 4000 years ago, and who
have never repudiated or relinquished their claim to any of the land
despite twice being exiled from it, once for 70 years, and most
recently for 1813 years – who have the sole claim.
Nationally, the Arabs come from Arabia. And although they today have
more than 20 states, the Arabs are still, ethnically, one nation, as
they themselves aver.
The Arabs who settled in Ottoman Palestine had no distinguishing
linguistic, cultural or historic characteristics setting them apart
from the Arabs living elsewhere in the Middle East. Their nationalist
awakening (in Palestine and elsewhere in the region) only began in the
20th Century after political Zionism was well underway.
Before the establishment of antisemitic terrorist Arab groups like the
PLO, the Palestinian Arabs had never had a single symbol of nationhood:
no flag, no passport, no anthem and, most importantly, no country.
Therefore, to talk about “giving land back” to the Palestinians as if
they have had a homeland and a state at some point in history is pure
fabrication and deception. The territory which the world today has
dared to earmark for the creation of Palestine is land that was
illegally occupied by Jordan (in the case of the “West Bank”) and
militarily administered by Egypt (the Gaza Strip). Prior to that those
areas, along with what is today Israel, were all part of the British
Mandate, and before that, formed part of a province in the Ottoman
Empire.
None of this territory can be given “back” to the Palestinians in the
national sense simply because they never had it. (US President George
W. Bush has acknowledged this by repeatedly spelling out his
administration’s determination to “create a new state alongside
Israel.”)
On the other hand, this land can absolutely be taken away or stolen
from the Jews for who – in their four-millennia-long history,
independent or occupied, whether they were in it or in exile – it has
always been their national home.
These arguments rage back and forth and have for many, often bloody,
decades. It is why the world generally sees the Israeli-“Palestinian”
conflict as unsolvable.
For the Bible-believer, however, there is no argument at all.
God is not intimidated or influenced by the numbers game. He never has
been. In fact, according to the Bible, He quite deliberately awarded
Abram (Abraham) the land as an everlasting inheritance when he was just
one man with his household.
When we read the verse in Genesis 12:7 where God tells Israel’s first
patriarch that He is to inherit the land, we see the almost “in your
face” way that promise comes hard on the heels of the no-nonsense
statement: “And the Canaanites were then in the land.”
It is as if God is saying quite clearly: ‘I am fully aware that there
are other nations in that land but even so, I am giving it to you.’
And indeed, when God reaffirms His promise of the land to Abram, He
spells out that not only are Abraham’s descendants to inherit the
territory, but bound up with it God was also giving into their hands
all the nations that then dwelt in that land.
On the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying: “To your
descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the
great river, the River Euphrates –”the Kenites, the Kenezzites, and
the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, and the Rephaim, the
Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites. (Genesis
15:18-21)
In summation then, for the purposes of this article, the promise of the
land was made solely to those who would descend from Abraham through
Isaac and Jacob. It was to be an everlasting inheritance that would
never be abrogated, not even by the unfaithful behavior of those
descendants.
And God made it with Abraham despite (or arguably even because of) the
fact that “the Canaanites were then in the land.”
That same Land belongs to this same nation, and exclusively to them,
until today. It makes NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER that Arabs live here* or
that they may have outnumbered the Jews. And it makes NO DIFFERENCE
WHATSOEVER if the entire world says otherwise, even if international
laws are passed stipulating the division and sharing of the land.
From the River of Egypt to the Euphrates, (including territory today
inside the borders of Lebanon, Syria and Jordan), this land has been
divinely bequeathed to Israel, and to Israel alone.
Original
Source
|
|
|||||||||
|
Shabbat Times
Subscribe 4 Updates
About Us
Search
Donations
This Month
Month Archive
Recent Photos
Login
|
The Canaanites were then in the =?windows-1252?Q?Land=92_?=
Comments
No comments found.
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||


![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://www.battalionofdeborah.org/logos/valid-rss.png)